SPQ20 vs. Sportpersonalities SportDNA Assessment

The SPQ20 is a sport-oriented mental skills assessment tool used with athletes to profile psychological factors, whereas the SportDNA Blueprint© is a sport-specific psychological profiling system designed to translate those factors into actionable performance strategies.

Take the Free Sport Test

At a Glance

SPQ20 (Sport Personality Questionnaire)

Publisher MySkillsProfile Ltd
Purpose To assess mental skills, mental toughness, confidence, and psychological factors relevant to athletic performance and support coaching and development strategies.
Constructs

20 scales organized under four broad factors (per BPS: confidence & resilience; achievement drive & competitiveness; interaction & sportsmanship; power & aggressiveness). Publisher materials also describe six key areas in some versions (e.g., dynamism, motives & values, openness, sociability, anxieties, performance techniques). Examples of scales include: Competitiveness, Self-Efficacy, Flow, Ethics, Visualization, Goal Setting, Fear of Failure, etc.

Length 168 items (20 scales × ~8 items each)
Format Self-report, 5-point Likert scale (Never / Almost Never → Always / Almost Always)
Cost/License Licensed through MySkillsProfile; typical individual access price ~ £25 GBP (~USD equivalent) via the publisher site.
Target Users Athletes, coaches, sport psychologists

Sport Personality Profiling

What It Does The SportPersonalities SportDNA Blueprint© translates personality psychology into actionable training strategies, competitive tactics, and coaching approaches tailored to athletic performance contexts. Unlike general personality assessments, it provides athletes and coaches with sport-specific insights across four performance-critical dimensions: cognitive style, competitive orientation, motivational drivers, and social performance preferences.
Four Pillars

• Drive (Intrinsic ↔ Extrinsic): What fuels motivation — mastery vs. recognition.
• Competitive Style (Self-Referenced ↔ Other-Referenced): Whom the athlete measures against — self vs. opponents.
• Cognitive Approach (Tactical ↔ Reactive): How decisions and focus operate under pressure — structured planning vs. adaptive instinct.
• Social Style (Collaborative ↔ Autonomous): Where athletes perform best — within a team vs. independently.

Length ~10 minutes (average completion time ≈ 40 questions)
Output

• Identification of 1 of 16 base sport personality types
• Personalized training & mindset recommendations
• Team-dynamics and communication insights
• Coach-ready feedback with guidelines for practice design
• Immediate online results and optional premium 7-dimensional profile (including Mental Toughness, Perfectionism, Leadership Style)

For Whom Athletes • Coaches • Teams • Sport psychologists • Parents of developing athletes
Unique Advantages

• Built exclusively for athletic contexts (not generic personality use)
• Integrates validated constructs from sport psychology (e.g., motivation orientation, competitive anxiety, decision-making under pressure)
• Translates psychological insight into actionable training and coaching strategies
• Requires no certification to interpret — reports are self-explanatory
• Continuously refined through coach feedback and applied case data
• Available instantly online; premium analysis adds 7-dimensional depth (16 types × 81 combinations)

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureSPQ20 (Sport Personality Questionnaire)Sport Personality Profiling
PurposeTo assess mental skills, mental toughness, confidence, and psychological factors relevant to athletic performance and support coaching and development strategies.The SportPersonalities SportDNA Blueprint© translates personality psychology into actionable training strategies, competitive tactics, and coaching approaches tailored to athletic performance contexts. Unlike general personality assessments, it provides athletes and coaches with sport-specific insights across four performance-critical dimensions: cognitive style, competitive orientation, motivational drivers, and social performance preferences.
Constructs

20 scales organized under four broad factors (per BPS: confidence & resilience; achievement drive & competitiveness; interaction & sportsmanship; power & aggressiveness). Publisher materials also describe six key areas in some versions (e.g., dynamism, motives & values, openness, sociability, anxieties, performance techniques). Examples of scales include: Competitiveness, Self-Efficacy, Flow, Ethics, Visualization, Goal Setting, Fear of Failure, etc.

• Drive (Intrinsic ↔ Extrinsic): What fuels motivation — mastery vs. recognition.
• Competitive Style (Self-Referenced ↔ Other-Referenced): Whom the athlete measures against — self vs. opponents.
• Cognitive Approach (Tactical ↔ Reactive): How decisions and focus operate under pressure — structured planning vs. adaptive instinct.
• Social Style (Collaborative ↔ Autonomous): Where athletes perform best — within a team vs. independently.

ContextAthletes, coaches, sport psychologistsSport-specific, performance-focused
Depth of Feedback

Profiling mental skills / toughness in athletes
• Designing mental-skills training or interventions
• Monitoring psychological development across season
• Helping coaches understand athlete’s strengths / risks

• Identification of 1 of 16 base sport personality types
• Personalized training & mindset recommendations
• Team-dynamics and communication insights
• Coach-ready feedback with guidelines for practice design
• Immediate online results and optional premium 7-dimensional profile (including Mental Toughness, Perfectionism, Leadership Style)

Team FitLimited team focusDetailed team role and dynamics analysis
Coaching ReadinessResearch-orientedCoach-ready insights and training recommendations
CostLicensed through MySkillsProfile; typical individual access price ~ £25 GBP (~USD equivalent) via the publisher site.Free basic profile; premium reports available
AccessRequires licensing or authorized providerImmediate online access, no certification required

How to Read SPQ20 (Sport Personality Questionnaire) in Sport Terms

While the SPQ20 measures general personality dimensions, athletes and coaches can gain sport-specific insights by considering how broad personality traits manifest in athletic performance contexts. The following interpretive framework helps translate general personality characteristics into the sport-specific language of the SportPersonalities framework, though direct mapping has limitations since the constructs measure different psychological domains.

Interpretive note: The mappings below are conceptual translations, not empirically validated equivalences between SPQ20 scales and SportDNA pillars. SPQ20 does not publish cross-test mappings.

Intuition
→ May correspond to Cognitive Style (Reactive vs. Tactical) - Athletes high in intuition align with Reactive cognitive processing, relying on instinctive pattern recognition and spontaneous decision-making during competition rather than predetermined analytical frameworks.
Coaches working with high-intuition athletes should design training environments that replicate the chaos and unpredictability of competition rather than heavily scripted drills. For example, a basketball coach might use small-sided games with constantly changing rules rather than structured play rehearsals, allowing the athlete to develop their instinctive read-and-react capabilities. Communication should focus on feel and flow rather than technical breakdowns, asking questions like 'What did you sense happening?' rather than 'What was the predetermined play?'
Competitiveness
→ May align to Competitive Style (Other-Referenced vs. Self-Referenced) - High competitiveness typically indicates Other-Referenced orientation, where athletes derive energy from direct comparison, rivalry, and the pursuit of victory over opponents rather than personal performance standards.
Athletes scoring high in competitiveness often perform best when coaches frame training and competition around opponent analysis and competitive positioning rather than purely internal benchmarks. A track coach might motivate an Other-Referenced sprinter by showing competitor split times and creating head-to-head training races, whereas the same approach might distract a Self-Referenced athlete focused on technical execution. These athletes may struggle with motivation during solo training sessions and benefit from structured competitive elements even in practice environments.
Achievement
→ May align to Drive (Extrinsic vs. Intrinsic) - Achievement orientation reflects the degree to which athletes are motivated by external recognition, tangible outcomes, and measurable success markers, aligning with Extrinsic motivation patterns.
Coaches should provide athletes high in achievement motivation with clear performance benchmarks, public recognition opportunities, and structured reward systems that validate their progress. For instance, a swimming coach might create a visible performance board tracking personal records and competition placements, or establish milestone celebrations when athletes achieve qualifying times. During injury rehabilitation or off-season training when external validation is limited, these athletes require deliberate goal-setting structures and progress markers to maintain engagement.
Relationships
→ May reflect Social Style (Collaborative vs. Autonomous) - This dimension directly corresponds to whether athletes thrive in interconnected team environments (Collaborative) or prefer independent, self-directed training approaches (Autonomous).
Athletes scoring high in relationships need training environments that foster connection, shared accountability, and collective energy to perform optimally. A strength coach working with a Collaborative athlete might schedule training sessions with partners or small groups rather than isolated individual work, and use team challenges or relay formats to maintain engagement. Conversely, forcing highly relationship-oriented athletes into extended periods of solo training without deliberate connection strategies can lead to motivation decline and suboptimal performance.
Adaptability
→ May map to Cognitive Style (Reactive vs. Tactical) - Adaptability reflects Reactive cognitive processing, indicating an athlete's capacity to adjust spontaneously to changing competitive conditions without relying on predetermined strategic plans.
High-adaptability athletes benefit from training that emphasizes constraint-led approaches and variable practice conditions rather than repetitive blocked practice. A tennis coach might constantly change court positions, ball speeds, and tactical scenarios within a single session, forcing the athlete to problem-solve in real-time rather than groove fixed patterns. These athletes often struggle with overly prescriptive game plans and perform better when given strategic principles rather than rigid tactical instructions.
Goal Setting
→ May map to Competitive Style (Self-Referenced vs. Other-Referenced) and Drive (Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic) - Systematic goal-setting practices align with Self-Referenced athletes who track personal progression and Tactical thinkers who use structured planning frameworks.
Athletes who engage deeply with goal-setting processes typically perform best when coaches establish clear performance benchmarks tied to personal development rather than solely outcome-based competitive results. For example, a gymnastics coach might work with a Self-Referenced athlete to set specific technical mastery goals for each apparatus, with detailed progress tracking and regular review sessions. Other-Referenced athletes may require goal structures that incorporate competitive positioning alongside personal standards to maintain full engagement with the planning process.

Pros & Cons

SPQ20 (Sport Personality Questionnaire) - Pros

  • Provides multidimensional trait-based mental skills assessment for athletes (e.g. confidence, resilience, goal-setting)
  • Useful for self- insight, comparing across athletes or over time
  • Extends into non-sport life domains (behaviour, personality generalization)
  • Used in sport contexts; designed for athletes with reporting aimed at performance enhancement.

SPQ20 (Sport Personality Questionnaire) - Cons

  • Requires interpretation to turn trait scores into actionable training or coaching strategies
  • Less direct guidance for performance-specific interventions under pressure
  • Does not explicitly model constructs like social style, tactical/ reactive decision-making, or team-role dynamics
  • Self-report bias and response-style effects (impression management scale exists to address this)
  • Norms and supporting studies cited in available manuals draw on samples from ~2003–2010 (and related technical docs), which may warrant updating for certain present-day populations.

When to Use Each Test

When to Use SPQ20 (Sport Personality Questionnaire)

  • When seeking broad personality insights that apply to life domains beyond athletic performance and competition
  • When working with athletes who need general self-awareness for personal development or career planning outside sport
  • As a complementary assessment alongside sport-specific tools to provide holistic personality context
  • When organizational requirements mandate standardized personality assessments across athletic and non-athletic personnel
  • For research contexts comparing athlete personality traits to general population norms across broad psychological dimensions

When to Use Sport Personality Profiling

  • When athletes need specific training recommendations based on their cognitive processing style and motivational drivers
  • When coaches require actionable strategies for communicating with, motivating, and developing individual athletes with different psychological profiles
  • When building team compositions and need to understand how different athlete sport profiles interact and complement each other in competitive environments
  • When designing periodized training programs that account for individual differences in how athletes respond to various training stimuli and competitive pressure
  • When athletes are struggling with performance consistency and need to understand whether their training approach matches their natural psychological tendencies

Key Takeaways

  • The SPQ20 provides sport-oriented personality/mental-skills insights that can also generalize beyond sport, whereas the SportDNA Blueprint© delivers sport-specific profiling with immediate performance applications.
  • General personality assessments require interpretation and translation to inform training and coaching decisions, whereas sport-specific tools provide ready-to-implement strategies tailored to athletic contexts
  • Both assessments can complement each other when athletes need holistic self-awareness alongside targeted performance enhancement guidance
  • Coaches seeking actionable strategies for training design, motivation, and team building will find sport-specific assessments more immediately applicable than general personality frameworks
  • The choice between assessments depends on whether your primary goal is broad self-awareness or targeted athletic performance optimization with specific coaching applications

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use both the SPQ20 and SportDNA Blueprint together, or do I need to choose one?

Both assessments are fully compatible and can complement each other effectively in your sport psychology toolkit. The SPQ20 provides a research-based snapshot of 20 dimensions (reported under four broad factors in BPS materials; some publisher pages group them into six key areas) relevant to sport performance, while the SportDNA Blueprint offers a more comprehensive analysis of behavioral tendencies, communication preferences, and personalized development strategies. Many athletes and coaches find value in starting with the more accessible SportDNA Blueprint at $27 to gain immediate actionable insights, then adding the SPQ20 when deeper academic research or specific trait measurement is needed. Using both together can provide a more complete picture, with the SPQ20 offering validated trait scores and the SportDNA Blueprint translating personality into practical coaching and performance applications.

Which assessment should I choose if I am working with a youth athlete versus a professional athlete?

The SportDNA Blueprint is generally more appropriate for youth athletes due to its accessible language, visual presentation, and focus on development rather than clinical assessment. Youth athletes and their parents typically respond better to the Blueprint's practical recommendations and coaching tips, which can be immediately applied to training and competition scenarios. The SPQ20 may be more suitable for collegiate and professional athletes who are working with sport psychologists or researchers who need validated psychometric data for performance profiling or academic study. However, both assessments can be valuable at any level depending on your specific goals, with the Blueprint offering broader applicability for everyday coaching situations and the SPQ20 providing more specialized trait measurement for formal performance programs.

How do the costs compare between these two assessments, and what do I get for the price?

The SportDNA Blueprint is priced at $27 for individual athletes and coaches, with team pricing options and subscription plans available for organizations working with multiple athletes. The SPQ20 pricing varies depending on the provider and context, as it is typically administered through academic institutions, sport psychology practitioners, or research settings where costs may include professional interpretation services. When comparing value, consider that the SportDNA Blueprint includes an extensive personalized report with actionable strategies, communication guides, and coaching recommendations that can be immediately applied without requiring professional interpretation. The SPQ20 provides validated psychometric scores that are valuable for research, formal assessments, or when working with credentialed sport psychologists who can integrate the results into comprehensive performance plans. Both assessments offer distinct value propositions, with the Blueprint emphasizing accessibility and immediate application at a transparent price point, while the SPQ20 offers academic rigor and research credibility in more formal settings.

What kind of scientific research and validation backs each of these assessments?

The SPQ20 has publisher technical documentation detailing development, reliability, validity evidence, norms, and correlations with performance indicators. This assessment has undergone formal peer review and statistical analysis to ensure it accurately measures the six personality dimensions it claims to assess, making it a credible tool for research and clinical sport psychology applications. The SportDNA Blueprint is built on established personality psychology frameworks and has been refined through practical application with thousands of athletes, though it emphasizes applied utility over academic validation. While the SPQ20 offers stronger scientific credentials for research purposes and formal psychological assessment, the SportDNA Blueprint provides evidence-based insights drawn from validated personality theory and real-world testing with athletes and coaches. Your choice between them may depend on whether you prioritize peer-reviewed academic validation or practical, field-tested application in coaching environments.

Which assessment works better for team building and understanding group dynamics?

The SportDNA Blueprint is specifically designed with team applications in mind, offering detailed guidance on how different personality types interact, communicate, and can complement each other in team settings. The report includes sections on working with teammates, understanding different communication styles, and leveraging personality diversity for team success, making it particularly valuable for coaches building team culture. The SPQ20 can certainly be used for team profiling by comparing individual scores across team members, but it requires more interpretation expertise to translate trait scores into practical team-building strategies. For coaches seeking ready-to-use team insights without extensive sport psychology training, the SportDNA Blueprint at $27 per athlete with available team pricing makes it more accessible for group applications. Both assessments can reveal important team dynamics, but the Blueprint provides more direct guidance on applying personality insights to improve team cohesion and performance.

How often should athletes retake these assessments, and how stable are the results over time?

Personality traits measured by both assessments are generally stable over time, particularly in adults, so frequent retesting is typically unnecessary and may not yield meaningfully different results. Most sport psychologists recommend retaking personality assessments only when significant life changes occur, when transitioning between major competitive levels, or after 2-3 years to track developmental changes in younger athletes. The SPQ20, measuring fundamental personality traits, would be expected to show high stability and consistency across retakes in the absence of major life events or interventions. The SportDNA Blueprint may be worth revisiting slightly more frequently, perhaps annually for youth athletes or when changing teams or coaches, as it focuses on applied behaviors and preferences that can evolve with experience and development. Rather than frequent retaking, both assessments are best used as foundational tools that inform ongoing development conversations and coaching adjustments throughout a season or training cycle.

Do I need special certification or training to use and interpret these assessments?

The SPQ20 is designed as a research-grade instrument and is most appropriately used by individuals with training in sport psychology, psychometrics, or related fields who can properly interpret trait scores and integrate them into professional practice. Many academic and clinical contexts require that psychological assessments be administered and interpreted by credentialed professionals to ensure ethical use and accurate understanding of the results. The SportDNA Blueprint, in contrast, is specifically designed for direct use by athletes, coaches, and parents without requiring specialized training or certification in psychology. The Blueprint report is written in accessible language with built-in interpretation and practical recommendations, making it immediately actionable for anyone involved in sport without professional psychology credentials. This difference in accessibility is a key distinguishing factor, with the SPQ20 serving professional and research contexts while the SportDNA Blueprint democratizes personality insights for everyday coaching and athlete development applications.

Ready to Discover Your Sport Personality?

Take our free assessment and get your personalized sport profile profile in minutes.

Take the Free Sport Test
Scroll to Top